Thread:Plant777/@comment-35465316-20180505044145

If we're to bring this wiki up to modern standards for a new audience, there needs to be some kind of quality control. Not particularly overbearing, but at the very least keeps things clean. Specifically, it would probably involve warding off:


 * Zero-effort posts (at least going forward; most of the stuff already present can be kept somewhere for posterity's sake, with some particularly obvious exceptions)
 * "Useless" characters (i.e. too bland, Mary Sues, "satellites" (see below for definition), etc.)
 * Extreme tonal shifts that are not executed well enough to stay (see: the Movie Issues)
 * Teal links in the mainspace (users have plenty of personal space to use as a sandbox, and forums can be expanded for drafts)
 * Mischaracterizations (obviously; issues 6, 8, 12, and 22 notwithstanding for now)

...and that's all I can really think of without going too harsh on others. On the other hand, I think I have a good list of things I want pruned:

Yeah, we have a lot of cleaning up to do. Any ideas on how to shape a proper quality control regimen? 
 * The Movie Issue page - I've complained twice about it being needlessly edgy and just not fitting in with the rest of the site. I personally see the Roses as just "straight-man" characters, anyways.
 * Rageguy-nut and Trollface-nut - it's not 2011 anymore, people. Get that away from us ASAP.
 * Gat-melon - seems useless as a character, being a "satellite," one who exists solely to form relations with another character
 * Ninja Blover - again, a "satellite" and more-or-less belongs to a now-deleted user anyways (specifically, PeaShooter, which CBam threw out for adding an unnecessary pop culture reference)
 * Individual ship pages - better to condense them into one page and scatter some of the information within across other articles